EMIS’s vary widely in functionality, and if you are looking to purchase an EMIS for your organization, it’s important that you document your functional needs up front and ask appropriate questions of potential vendors. You may want to reference our How to Spec and Purchase an Energy Management Information System field guide for specific tips. System features, while critical, are only part of the story, however. Even a perfectly designed EMIS won’t provide the desired results if it’s not implemented correctly.
There are many facets to implementing an enterprise-level EMIS, and many organizations underestimate the amount of coordination and effort that are required to do it correctly. We’ve implemented our EnergyCAP EMIS hundreds of times over the past four decades, and we’ve learned a lot along the way. The content that follows outlines how we approach each implementation project. While the information is specific to our EnergyCAP solution, we hope that sharing our process will help you plan for and successfully execute your EMIS implementation.
Before your contract is finalized, during the presales and scoping process, we assign an implementation team to the project. The team is led by an experienced project manager who serves as the primary point-of-contact for the implementation project. The project manager is integral to setting the project plan and timelines and then executing on a shared strategy. The project manager will work with you week-to-week to ensure your project stays on time and on budget.
While EnergyCAP can operate as a standalone platform, its full value is unlocked through its integration with other systems. By leveraging EnergyCAP’s open architecture, our project engineering team can automate the push and pull of data to and from EnergyCAP in conjunction with most any metering or accounting platform. Our team has integrated with nearly all the top-selling metering and accounting platforms on the market, in addition to proprietary systems, so you can be confident that we’ve encountered your configuration before.
Would you like to bring historical data over from another EMIS or homegrown solution? EnergyCAP, LLC (ENC) has you covered. Our team can convert, import, and verify your data to provide you a historical frame of reference for your energy management efforts going forward.
In every step of the implementation process, the project management team keeps the client’s long-term success in mind. While readying the application for use, we’re also training your users to take over the administration and maintenance of EnergyCAP once the project is complete. Part of the process includes the creation of a Knowledge Transfer Document (KTD), which consists of an organization-specific history detailing the unique how-to decisions made during the implementation process. The KTD supplements EnergyCAP’s software documentation and best practices by documenting “how we do it” within each client organization.
Today, nearly all new EnergyCAP users leverage our Bill CAPture bill processing services. Bill CAPture allows users to automate low-value tasks, like bill collection, processing, and entry to provide more time and focus on higher value and more strategic work. During EMIS implementation, our Bill CAPture team collects a sample of your recent utility bills for the enrollment process, trains our processor to “read” your bills, and then maps your preferred bill data to fields in the EnergyCAP database. The enrollment will lay the foundation for bill processing in the months and years to come.
Often, today’s software tools are geared toward allowing users to implement and maintain the application independently. That’s true of our EnergyCAP application. We provide more tools than ever to allow users to integrate our application with their accounting, metering, BAS, and other platforms. We give our users the means to easily import and export data, to slice and dice data for reporting, and to configure views and dashboards to support their unique workflows. With all these tools at our customers’ disposal, why engage ENC’s project management team?
Answer: There is simply no replacement for experience. Due to our experience, our implementation team can address common challenges and propose creative solutions for uncommon challenges. Following are some examples:
Size, Scope, and Siloes
Energy management and utility bill accounting functions span the entire enterprise, touching numerous departments, processes, and functions, often with disparate leadership, goals, and obstacles. Our project managers bring a global view to your implementation project. The EnergyCAP project manager brings the disparate and sometimes siloed data into a single vision and serves as a neutral third party, bringing objectivity and experience to address challenges that inevitably arise with complex, cross-departmental cooperation.
A question we often discuss with customers who are weighing the value of our implementation services is, “How long did it take for your data to get in its current state?” For almost every user, energy and utility bill data management evolve as needs and circumstances change…a new building here, a new metering system there. As in Darwin’s theory of evolution, some species thrive, a lot of them go extinct, and some of them linger on, perhaps long after they should. When customers think about the many lines of their energy data management evolution, among many departments, there may be decades of data and processes to unravel in order to arrive at an intelligent design.
Our implementation team specializes in helping our customers distill a legacy of data down into relevant, organized, and future-facing information.
Breadth and Depth of Expertise
When it comes to implementing enterprise-level software, there is a lot to know. The most experienced energy manager may not possess deep knowledge of utility bill accounting. A leader in the accounting department may be unfamiliar with the best practices for cost avoidance (M&V) calculations. And, neither of these folks may bring the development experience to bear to automate the processes that will streamline their workflows. Implementation requires a team approach, and EnergyCAP’s team can handle all facets of your project.
|Senior Project Manager &
PM Team Lead
|Chief Project Officer, Project Management Office||
|Bill CAPture Specialist||
|Sales Account Manager||
The EMIS implementation fee is based primarily on expected labor hours, and perhaps not surprisingly, experience. Experience is the difference when it comes to estimating the time and level of effort required for a successful implementation. With hundreds of successful software implementations under our belts, we’ve come to learn what works, what doesn’t, and how to spot problems before they take root.
In order to determine the level of effort and timeline for an implementation project, we draw on insights from our history of implementation projects. EnergyCAP sales representatives work with each customer to determine which software features, integrations, and services are appropriate for their respective organizations. With this information in hand, the EnergyCAP representative then works with our Project Management Office to compare past projects with the current client’s needs and attributes. Using historical averages and expected nuances, the teams will then budget the time and resources required to successfully implement your EnergyCAP solution.
On average, a full EMIS implementation project requires 6–12 months to complete. Timelines vary widely with project size and scope, and the EnergyCAP representative provides a detailed timeline with milestones and definitions of ENC and client responsibilities. The duration of the project is most impacted by the client’s ability to provide information and make decisions.
The ENC project manager may offer multiple options for integrating EnergyCAP with metering, BAS, accounting, and other platforms. The best method for integration depends on the capabilities of the platform with which we’re integrating EnergyCAP and the customer-specific goals for the integration. In most cases, the best path forward for integration boils down to a handful of questions:
How is data made available from the platform?
In the vast majority of cases, EnergyCAP integrates interval or accounting data via file transfers from metering or BAS/BMS or AP/GL systems. These systems generally write data to an intermediary file format, like XLS, which can be imported into EnergyCAP. In some cases, the platform may not write data into an acceptable format, or the client may prefer a tighter integration of systems. In these instances, the project manager may recommend integrating EnergyCAP’s API with APIs offered by the metering or accounting platform. API-based integrations require technical expertise to implement and may extend the implementation schedule a bit, but they offer a high level of stability and reliability.
What does the data look like?
In some cases, data coming from metering platforms for ingestion into EnergyCAP or data flowing from EnergyCAP to accounting is well formatted for import. When this happens, the level of integration effort will be less than or close to our historical averages. In other cases, interval and accounting data may not be closely aligned to the import format required by EnergyCAP or other systems. In this latter scenario, ENC’s implementation team can write an intermediary application to reformat the data and save it in a format that is import-ready. Creating a reformatter may add implementation time and effort, but the payback period is typically short due to increased workflow efficiency and improved data reliability and accuracy.
How will meter data be imported into EnergyCAP and how often will imports occur?
Once meter data is available and in an importable format, we’re ready to bring it into the EnergyCAP application. EnergyCAP supports the manual import of data through the user interface by leveraging our Interval Data Import Formats, which allow for straightforward mapping of spreadsheet files to fields in the EnergyCAP database.
When users have hundreds or thousands of interval data files generated each day, manual imports of data prove unrealistic. To support the upload of interval data at scale, our implementation staff write automation routines to pick up and automatically import interval data at regular intervals. Clients determine the interval at which EnergyCAP automatically imports meter data. For most, a nightly import of data is sufficient, while other users require more frequent imports, every 30 or 15 minutes, for example.
While ENC boasts an impressive record of delivering implementation projects on time and on budget, we encounter some challenges on the path to success. Below are some common obstacles that may be helpful to anticipate when preparing your organization for the implementation process.
Since EnergyCAP has integrated its platform with so many metering, BAS, and accounting platforms, it seems reasonable to assume that we can simply duplicate the steps for each system whenever we encounter a system we’ve worked with before. The reality is, however, that each integration is unique. Standard formats, as defined in different platforms’ documentation, can be anything but standard, with configurations as unique as the organizations we serve. That’s why we spend significant time and energy in the scoping process—to go beyond how systems are supposed to work and gain an understanding of how things truly work (or should work) in your organization.
Since EnergyCAP’s utility spans so many disciplines and departments, it’s sometimes difficult to know who “owns” the implementation project within our clients’ organizations. History shows us that delays on the client side pose the biggest risk to your project timeline and budget. Customers should expect that their internal project manager will be as engaged and involved in the day-to-day management of their EnergyCAP implementation as ENC’s team. Prompt decisions and honest, thorough feedback drive the timeliness and quality of the implementation project.
Below are client-side roles that are typically filled in successful EnergyCAP implementation projects.
While EnergyCAP’s staff makes every effort to extract all relevant scope details before the project begins, it’s not uncommon for new information to come to light during the implementation project. Very often, stakeholders whose needs for reporting, workflows, organization schemes, and the like may introduce new requests after the project has begun. We make every effort to accommodate our clients’ needs within the allotted schedule and budget, and we will be happy to provide a change order and a project rate to deliver on the expanded scope. That said, to maintain a budget and timeline, it’s always best to ensure that any potential stakeholder interests are represented in the initial scoping process. In short, ask for input among expected EMIS users early in the process, and emphasize the importance of agreeing on the scope prior to implementation project kick-off.